Protecting Jasper County’s History, Culture, and Ecosystem
We have one chance to get this right…Tell Ridgeland to DENY annexation!
Take Action:
Sign the petition (see full petition and annexation area map below):
Tell the Town of Ridgeland to Honor Jasper County’s Moratorium and Deny Annexations
Call and email Ridgeland Town Representatives. If you sent an email previously and didn’t copy the Clerk to Council please send it again using the link below.
TOWN COUNCIL
OR STAFF |
JOB TITLE | PHONE | WORK EMAIL |
Joey Malphrus | Mayor | 843-726-7500 | [email protected] |
Josephine Boyles | Councilwoman | 843-226-0205 | [email protected] |
Bill Fishburne | Councilman | 843-384-7509 | [email protected] |
Libby Malphrus | Councilwoman | 843-321-0940 | [email protected] |
Tommy Rhodes | Councilman | 843-540-0587 | [email protected] |
Dennis Averkin | Town Administrator | 843-726-7500
ext. 7504 |
[email protected] |
Heather Spade | Planning Director | 843-726-7521 | [email protected] |
Penny Daley | Clerk to Council | 843-726-7502 | [email protected] |
Or mail your letter to:
-
-
- Thursday 3/7 @ 6PM – Special Ridgeland Town Council Meeting for Planning Commission recommendations for Chelsea Annexation at the new location Lakeside at Blue Heron 153 James L. Taylor Drive
- The last two public hearings of the Ridgeland Town Council are also at the new location Lakeside at Blue Heron 153 James L. Taylor Drive
- March 21st @ 6 PM
- April 4th @ 6 PM
-
Latest News…
Proposed Chelsea Annexation
Petition Against the Annexation of Chelsea into the Town of Ridgeland
On January 18th, 2024, the Town of Ridgeland voted 4-1 to accept an annexation petition for 3,000 acres
of the rural-zoned Chelsea property along the Port Royal Sound. The Chelsea property is located squarely
within Jasper County’s development moratorium boundary—the Euhaw Broad River Planning Area. The
annexation request is tied to a masterplan and development agreement that would permit 2,000+
dwelling units and 500,000+ square feet of commercial space–potentially overwhelming narrow and
rural roads such as Highway 462 and Snake Road and forever changing the landscape’s rural character
and existing communities. For decades, the almost 6,000-acre Chelsea property was managed for upland hunting and timber. Since then, the property has been managed by a Missouri based entity with no ties to our local community and has been shopped around to developers seeking to significantly upzone the rural landscape and convert it to maximum large-scale development. In 2022, the 292-acre Chelsea South parcel, which is nearly half wetlands, went before Jasper County
Council requesting 4x the allowed density under its existing rural zoning. Met with widespread opposition
from the community and in conflict with the county’s future land use and growth patterns, the proposal did
not make it past a first reading at the county. Now, the current annexation proposal before the Town of
Ridgeland includes three parcels of Chelsea that are undeveloped forest land in rural, unincorporated
Jasper County within the moratorium-restricted Euhaw Broad River Planning Area.
Jasper County’s moratorium extends through March 2024 to allow the County time to improve its
comprehensive plan, future land use map, and rural zoning standards. By entertaining this annexation at
this time, the Town of Ridgeland is contradicting the spirit and intent of the development moratorium,
which was enacted to better protect priceless environmental and culturally sensitive areas such as the
Chelsea properties. We the undersigned, petition the Town of Ridgeland to deny the proposed annexation for
the following reasons: -Ridgeland already has several large, planned developments that have yet to build out such as the
Genesis PDD. The cumulative impact of approving thousands of additional new development
units would greatly impact Hwy. 462 and Snake Road, stretching Ridgeland’s boundaries all the
way to Hwy. 170. These critical regional road corridors are already over-burdened. -The annexation, if approved, would vastly expand the town’s municipal boundaries and create
additional contiguity for future annexations. This domino effect sets the stage for suburban
sprawl that degrades and eliminates natural resources and rural areas while also being costly for a
small Town of 3,800 residents to adequately supply essential services to over the long-term. -We understand and respect that the Town wants to grow, however this is simply the wrong place.
New growth and commercial investments should be located in the Town’s core district. -We do not want to jeopardize priceless environmental and cultural resources that contribute
greatly to our quality of life. A more comprehensive approach to the Euhaw Broad River Planning
Area is needed during the ongoing Jasper County Moratorium to ensure these resources are
protected and not lost forever. -The annexation flies in the face of regional inter-governmental cooperation and planning and
would contradict the comprehensive plan for the area and drive-up costs and zoning entitlements.
Ridgeland should work alongside Jasper County Council and their planning consultant to
understand the landscape, needs, and wants in the entire corridor. While the applicants are
proposing land for conservation and mitigation, the areas set aside are primarily undevelopable
wetlands. -Now more than ever, it is critical for our local governments to work together to protect rural
lands, invest in existing communities, and come up with solutions to manage rapid growth in this
region.
Annexation 101 from our partners at the Coastal Conservation League
ANNEXATION 101: LET’S TALK ABOUT THE CHELSEA DEVELOPMENT
by Emmi Palenbaum
SHARE
Welcome to Annexation 101!
The Town of Ridgeland voted to accept an annexation petition for 3,000 acres of land along Snake Road that abuts Hazzard Creek and the Port Royal Sound watershed. The annexation request is tied to a master plan and development agreement that would permit over 2,000 dwelling units and 500,000 sf of commercial development.
What is annexation?
Annexation is the legal process used by towns and cities (aka municipalities) to expand their borders and increase populations by bringing additional land under their governance.
How are properties annexed?
In South Carolina, landowners initiate the annexation process via a petition to bring their property or properties into the municipality. The property(ies) must be contiguous within the municipality. There are three methods of annexation: 100%, 75%, and 25% methods.
What is “contiguity”?
A property is contiguous to a municipality if it is adjacent to and shares a continuous border with property already in the municipality. Under South Carolina law, contiguity still exists if the property to be annexed is separated from the municipality by a road, water, or marsh.
WHAT TO ANNEX:
Doughnut Holes:
Doughnut holes are property or clusters of properties under county governance that are surrounded by properties in the city. It simply makes sense, practically and economically, for the city–rather the county–to provide services such as police, water, sewer, and garbage pick up to these properties within its geographical borders.
Smart Growth:
Annexation also makes sense when a city or town accommodates future growth by incorporating land and approving development that can be serviced by existing infrastructure. Smart communities will establish an “urban growth boundary” or “urban service boundary” that clearly delineates urban and suburban areas with infrastructure where annexations make sense–and rural areas without services where annexations do not.
WHAT NOT TO ANNEX:
Rural & Ecologically Sensitives Areas:
Unwise annexations occur when a municipality annexes properties in a remote, rural areas outside of urban growth boundaries and or without existing infrastructure to provide reliable and affordable services to residents or potential residents.
You know the story–in exchange for annexation and upzoning, speculative developers promise increased tax revenue from the new rural development. Time and again municipalities annex these properties and extend services and infrastructure only to be stuck with escalating water, sewer and transportation costs, fragmented country side, and habitat destruction.
Development in far-flung rural communities simply does not pay for itself. Studies show that for every dollar of property tax revenue generated, it costs $1.16 to provide public services to that now suburban home. Municipalities struggle to service sprawling development far from their community’s core.
What can you do?
Contact Town Council and voice your opposition to the Chelsea annexation.
Sign a petition urging Ridgeland Town Council to reject the owner’s petition for annexation.
Attend and speak at Ridgeland Town Council Meetings.
Write a letter to the editor to reach your neighbors and elected officials.
Letters to the Editor are a great way to reach members of your community, and to provide arguments for Town Council to deny the proposed Chelsea annexation and development agreement. Here are some tips for drafting:
Share a personal story. Are you a Ridgeland resident, a business owner, or a fisherman? Have you lived in the area your whole life? Why are you concerned about the proposed Chelsea annexation? You have an important and interesting story to tell. Write a letter in your own words expressing why you feel the way you do.
Stay focused. Keep your letter short and limit your arguments to one or two main points. Use no more than 150-200 words. The shorter, the better.
Make a call to action. Are you trying to influence local elected officials? Call them by their names. Ask your neighbors to join you and advocate for the Town of Ridgeland to deny the proposed annexation and development agreement for Chelsea. Ask them to reach out to their Councilmembers.
Follow-through. When your letter is published, print or save two copies. One for your fridge and one for your Councilmember. Send them a follow-up email or mail a copy of your letter to them.
Here are some compelling arguments that could be sued to support your personal experiences and perspective. Remember to choose talking points which resonate with you personally.
Too much, too fast, in the wrong location. Ridgeland is a small town of 3,600 residents. The Chelsea development would add 2,000 residential units and 500,000 square feet of commercial space. This could alter the town’s character and stretch resources thin. The costs of providing services to rural areas often falls on taxpayers.
Comprehensive approach needed to handle growth. We don’t want Ridgeland to be the next Hardeeville or Bluffton. By working together, we can better manage growth. Tell Town Council to work with the County, not undermine regional planning efforts.
Opening the floodgates. If the 3,000 acres are annexed, additional lines of contiguity will be created, opening the floodgates to future annexations. A property in contiguous to a municipality if it is adjacent to and shares a continuous border with property already in the municipality.
Lack of infrastructure and traffic. Chelsea is a rural-zoned area lacking the infrastructure to support rapid, sprawling growth that is far from the town’s center. Highway 462 and Snake Road are already overburdened and are unsafe. More development will worsen existing problems.
Impact to natural and cultural resources. Chelsea boasts cultural and environmental resources that contribute greatly to our quality of life and should not be taken for granted. We all deserve the right to drink clean water, fish and swim in our rivers, and breathe the clean air.
Thank you for your effort in this fight! For more information, please contact
Grant McClure, South Coast Project Manager
(c) 803-770-2074
(o) 843-522-1800
[email protected]
An aerial tour of what we are protecting…